93 415 22 44 | 91 310 30 08

  • ES
  • CA
  • EN

           
logologo
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
logologo
           
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
logologo
           
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
logologo
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
logologo
           
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
logologo
           
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
  • Firm
  • Team
  • Criminal defence
  • Compliance
  • Internal investigations
  • Penal Link
  • News
  • Contact
by Molins
Compliance, News11 April, 20230 comments

Compliance body: single-person or collegiate?

Having analyzed in the previous #ComplianceKeys the state of criminal liability of legal entities at the international level, the following publications will again take a national approach and analyze some issues related to the main elements that make up Compliance Systems.

In this sense, in accordance with article 31 bis 2. 2ª of the Criminal Code and all national and international technical standards on Compliance, one of the essential elements for the effectiveness of any Compliance System is the “Compliance Body“.

Criminal law regulations are relatively sparse regarding the characteristics of this Body. The aforementioned provision only establishes that the supervision of the functioning and compliance of the Compliance System must be entrusted to a body of the legal entity with autonomous powers of initiative and control or that is legally entrusted with the function of supervising the effectiveness of the internal controls of the legal entity.

In this regard, the legal entities that decide to adopt a Compliance System must reach several decisions regarding the configuration of the Compliance Body: Should an individual person be appointed or should a collegiate body be appointed? Who should constitute the Compliance Body? What functions should the Compliance Body have?

This ComplianceKeys will seek, briefly, to shed light on one of the issues raised above: some factors to be taken into account when choosing whether to set up a single-person Compliance Body (either under the name of Compliance Officer, Head of Compliance, among others) or a collegiate body (through a Compliance Committee, Ethics Committee, etc.). In any case, this second option is not an obstacle to the appointment of a Compliance Officer among the members of the collegiate body.

As it has been introduced, the regulation established in this regard in the Criminal Code does not provide an answer to this (and other) question. From going to the Circular of the State Attorney General’s Office 1/2016, on the criminal liability of legal entities, it can be concluded that the vagueness of the regulation is intentional. This vagueness would seek to provide freedom to legal entities to configure their Compliance Bodies in a way that suits their size, activity and resources.

Specifically, the aforementioned Circular states the following: “[…] the regulation refers to a compliance body (compliance officer or head of compliance) which, depending on the size of the legal entity, may be made up of one or more persons, with adequate training and authority“.

The decision to configure the Compliance Body as a unipersonal or collegiate body will be of a strategic nature, and it should be borne in mind that each option has its advantages and disadvantages.

As an illustration, some of the advantages and disadvantages commonly associated with each of the options are shown schematically below.

Option Advantages Disadvantages
Single-person body + Greater agility in decision-making.

+ In general, greater responsibility and commitment as the Compliance function falls on a single person.

+ In general, less need for resources.

+ Identification of the Compliance System with an individual who, if correctly chosen, can generate greater confidence in the members of the legal entity.

– Increased possibility of existence (or, as the case may be, relevance) of conflicts of interest.

– Adoption of relevant decisions on Compliance matters in a non-consensual manner, by a single individual.

– Possibility that the workload generated by the Compliance function is difficult to assume by a single individual.

Collegiate body + Consensual adoption of decisions on Compliance matters.

+ Easier processing of communications that may eventually affect a member of the Compliance Body.

+ Possibility of constituting the Compliance Body incorporating complementary technical profiles (legal, IT, labor).

+ Attractive option for medium-sized entities that do not have the resources to hire a person specifically dedicated to the development of the compliance function but have a Compliance System of a certain complexity.

– Slower decision-making and execution of decisions (difficulty in convening meetings, adopting certain conflictive decisions, reacting to urgent situations, etc.).

– Possible configuration of a collegiate body with executive management profiles (conflicts of interest).

 

In addition, it should be remembered that the Criminal Code provides for the possibility that, in the case of small legal entities, the compliance function may fall directly on their management body.

In order to recapitulate the different issues discussed in this article, the conclusions to be drawn from the above are that each entity will be free to choose, depending on its size, the sector in which it operates, the nature of its activities, taking into consideration the advantages and disadvantages associated with the decision, the configuration of the specific Compliance Body that will lead the development and supervision of its Compliance System.

Compliance Department of Molins Defensa Penal.

compliance@molins.eu

Tags:
Compliance ComplianceKeys criminal liability criminal risks Penal Corporate
Share
Criminal liability of legal persons in the United States and CanadaPrev
The functions and responsibilities of the Compliance OfficerNext

Latest Posts

by Molins

Is the Code of Ethics a key element of the compliance management system?

The Code of Ethics could be defined as the normative constitution of an organisation, that is, the fundamental regulation from which all others are derived....

Is the Code of Ethics a key element of the compliance management system?

Compliance, News23 May, 2023
Share
by Molins

The confession of the prosecutor in Lola Flores’ trial for defrauding the Treasury: “She was chosen as an example, for sure”

Thirty years after Lola Flores’ trial for defrauding the Treasury, La Sexta TV show analyzes the case with our managing partner in Madrid, Luis Jordana de...

The confession of the prosecutor in Lola Flores’ trial for defrauding the Treasury: “She was chosen as an example, for sure”

Appearance at MMCC22 May, 2023
Share

Categorías

  • Appearance at MMCC
  • Compliance
  • Internal Investigations
  • Legislative Novelty
  • News
  • Opinion article
logo

Molins Defensa Penal
is a Criminal Law boutique firm
exclusively dedicated.

Barcelona

Avda. Diagonal, 399 Planta 1

08008 Barcelona

Tel. +34 934 152 244

Fax. +34 934 160 693

Madrid

José Abascal, 56 Planta 6

28003 Madrid

Tel. +34 91 310 30 08

Fax. +34 91 391 51 58

© 2021 Molins Defensa Penal. Todos los derechos reservados.
  • Aviso legal
  • Código ético
  • Política de privacidad
  • Política de cookies
© 2019 Molins Defensa Penal. Tots els drets reservats.
  • Avís legal
  • Codi ètic
  • Política de privacitat
  • Política de cookies
© 2019 Molins Defensa Penal. All rights reserved.
  • Legal notice
  • Code of ethics
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies policy

We use our own cookies and third-party cookies to improve our services by analysing your browsing habits.

You can accept cookies by clicking on the «Accept» button or configure them or reject their use by clicking on Cookies policy.

  • ES
  • CA
  • EN
Logotipo Molins Defensa Penal
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Resume

This website uses cookies so that we can offer you the best possible user experience. The information of the cookies is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website or helping our team understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful. Read the full Cookies Policy.

Consult the left side menu to decide which cookies you allow us to install.

Cookies strictly necessary

The strictly necessary cookies must always be activated so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Si desactivas esta cookie no podremos guardar tus preferencias. Esto significa que cada vez que visites esta web tendrás que activar o desactivar las cookies de nuevo.

Statistics

We use our own and third party cookies to improve our services by analyzing your browsing habits.

You can accept cookies by clicking the "I accept" button or configure them or reject their use by clicking on the Cookies Policy.

¡Por favor, activa primero las cookies estrictamente necesarias para que podamos guardar tus preferencias!